|
JUNE 2007: South Africa: No one likes
a tattle-tale. They are nosy and obnoxious and in general just
cause trouble for unsuspecting and innocent people. Some people may
think that the Protected Disclosures Act ("the PDA")1 provides
protection for tattle-tales.
This is however not true. The PDA
only provides protection for those who honestly wish to expose
criminal and other irregular conduct in the workplace. In other
words, the PDA protects the brave of heart. I term them the brave
of heart because they are likely to fall out of favour with their
employers if they blow the whistle on criminal and other irregular
behaviour, and may thus be subjected to disciplinary action and
other occupational detriments. (Read
more...)
Big Brother
- Access to Employee Information
The right to privacy protects access
to personal matters and the obtaining, dissemination and use of
information in respect of such matters. It confers a protected
interest (“privacy”) and provides for certain duties of those bound
by the right, ie that the property and persons of those exercising
the right may not be searched, their possessions may not be seized
and the privacy of their communication may not unreasonably be
infringed.
The right to privacy is not absolute.
(Read
more...)
Making Dishonest Employees Pay : Section 37D of the Pension Funds
Act, 1956
Earlier this year Ernst & Young
released the results of its eighth international global survey
entitled “Fraud, the Unmanaged Risk”. Ernst & Young interviewed
nearly 400 CEOs of companies ranging from multinationals to
small-medium enterprises in more than 30 countries.
The survey revealed that
approximately 55% of the companies interviewed suffered a
significant fraud in the last 24 months. What surprised me was the
finding that the main perpetrators of the frauds were company
management or employees. In many cases the fraudster was a trusted,
long-serving employee.
In order to prevent fraud, employers
need not only proactively identify and manage fraud risks, but it
is just as important for an employer to act swiftly and decisively
when a fraud is discovered, so that the appropriate message is
filtered through the work force. (Read
more...)
Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 0f 2001 - from Paper to
Practice
South Africa's readmission to the
international arena, the deregulation of international markets and
the advancement in communication technology has resulted in a
dramatic escalation in organised crime in South Africa.
It has been estimated that as much as
19 billion US dollars in dirty money is laundered each year in
South Africa. Over 1000 suspicious transactions have been reported
to the authorities since 1998, without a single prosecution under
the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 1999 ("POCA"), which
criminalized money laundering and racketeering. That South Africa
is in need of effective measures to prevent money laundering is
clear. (Read
more...)
When witnesses lie in court
It sometimes happens that a party to
litigation fraudulently presents his evidence to the court and,
relying on the fraudulent evidence presented to it, the court then
makes its decision. In extreme cases the evidence may have been
deliberately fabricated (for example where a letter is forged) or,
in more subtle cases, a witness may purger himself (by lying to the
court about what happened). Even the most undeveloped sense of
justice would probably see the argument for having a judgment
obtained in the first scenario rescinded. But the argument for
rescission in the second scenario is less obvious – given that
witnesses lie in court every day and that there is nothing unusual
about this. (Read
more...)
Directors' Duties & Responsibilities and Organisational Ethics
It is the directors’ prime duty to
act at all times in the best interests of that company of which he
or she is a director
-
not his or her own personal
interests
-
not the interest of any shareholder
which he or she may represent
-
but the interests of the company
only
Four main duties arise out of this
prime duty: (Read
more...)
Access To Information
The Promotion of Access to
Information Act, 2000 (“the Act”) gives effect to the
Constitutional right of access to information and creates the
statutory framework within which a person may apply for access to
records from any private or public body.
Against, what the preamble calls, the
backdrop of a secret and unresponsive culture characterised by
human rights violations and abuses the Act seeks to promote
transparency and accountability in public and private bodies. (Read
more...)
Intercepting communications
How private are your telephone calls
and can they be recorded without your knowledge?
Most of us are aware that we have a
fundamental right to privacy and that this right is
constitutionally protected. We are not always aware, however, how
far this right will go to protecting what we deem to be private
communications and in what circumstances our right to privacy may
be ousted.
The Constitution states at s 14 that
‘everyone has the right to privacy which includes the right not to
have … the privacy of their communications infringed’. The
Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of
Communication-Related Information Act 70 of 2002 (See 2005 (Dec)
DR 38 – Editor) (which came into effect on 30 September
2005) (the Act) repealed the Interception and Monitoring
Prohibition Act 127 of 1992 (the IMP Act) and provided more
specific parameters in relation to the right to have private
communications as set out in the Constitution.
The Act provides for a general
prohibition of the interception of communications at s 2 where it
states that
‘no person may intentionally intercept
or attempt to intercept, or authorise or procure any other person
to intercept or attempt to intercept, at any place in the Republic,
any communication in the course of its occurrence or transmission’.
(Read
more...)
Taking of evidence abroad
The purpose of this article is to explain the
means by which evidence in civil and commercial matters can be
obtained by South African litigants from foreign countries and by
foreign litigants from South Africa, and also to highlight the
difficulties faced by South African and foreign litigants in
obtaining such evidence. (Read
more...)
An aspect of the promotion of Access to
Information Act - the manual
Section 32 of our Constitution provides that everyone has the
right of access to any information held by the State, and
further, that any person has the right of access to information
held by another person where such information is required for the
exercise or protection of any rights. The Promotion of Access to
Information Act 2 of 2000 ("the Act") was
promulgated to give effect to s32 of the Constitution. S51 of the
Act provides that the head of a private body is to compile a
manual which is to include categories of information held by the
private body. In this article, we discuss these categories of
information, and whether a private body will be required to
disclose such information to a requester.
The Act lists a number of grounds of refusal which a private
body may apply to prevent disclosure of information. (Read
more...)
Insider Trading Act, 1998
A committee broadly representative of the securities industry
under the chairmanship of Mr Mervyn King ("the Task Group")
was appointed in 1995 at the instance of the Minister of Finance
to investigate the adequacy of our law on insider trading (which
appeared, essentially, in section 440F of the Companies Act,
1973). The Task Group reported finally in October 1997 and its
recommendations formed the basis for the enactment of the Insider
Trading Act, 1998 ("the Act") which came into
force on 17 January 1999.
Scope
The Act covers trading in every kind of security or financial
instrument. It is, however, limited to those securities and
financial instruments that are dealt in on a regulated market. The
market might be a domestic or a foreign one and it does not matter
that the actual dealing might take place over the counter. (Read
more...)
Conflicting
evidence of handwriting experts
All too often a court is faced with conflicting evidence given by
so-called handwriting experts. This situation obviously disrupts
the trial and generally weakens the credibility of this type of
evidence.
Assuming that both experts are suitably qualified, honest, and that
their evidence is based on established principles and scientific
methods, there should, logically, be no disagreement. Since only
one of the opinions is correct, one of the experts has obviously
erred.
In this article I will suggest some of the sources of error that
can lead to this type of situation .
(Read
more...)
Prosecution-Led Investigation
The prosecutor is a critical role-player in the
criminal justice system. The prosecutor has been described as the
gatekeeper in the criminal justice process. In the exercise of his
or her functions the prosecutor has to, at various stages in the
criminal justice process, make decisions that have a profound
impact on the effective functioning of the criminal justice system.
These include, amongst others, the decision whether to institute
criminal proceedings against a suspect; the decision whether to
withdraw charges or to stop the prosecution, the decision whether
to appose an application for bail or release by an accused who is
in custody following arrest, the decision about which crimes to
charge an accused with and in which court the trial should proceed,
the decision whether to accept a guilty plea tendered by an accused
the decision about which evidence to present at the trial, the
decision whether to appeal, etc. ( Read
more...)
|